ACRE - Agricultural Conservation for Resilient Environments

Fuel Breaks  (NRCS #383)

Applicable Systems

About

Fuel breaks are strips or blocks of land with reduced or modified vegetation that limit the spread of fire. Fuel breaks should be designed to minimize risk of damage to any nearby buildings or resources, and fuel break length and width should be long and wide enough to contain the fire1 2. Fuel break establishment costs depend on the type of materials being treated, the size of the fuel break, and the methods used in implementing and managing fuel breaks.

Key aspects and considerations:

  • Integrate natural or existing features (lakes, streams, railroads) to increase fuel break efficiency.
  • Remove ladder fuels.
  • Thin overstory canopy.
  • Treat or remove slash.
  • Manage height, density and composition of grasses and forbs.
  • Regularly manage and inspect fuel breaks to avoid excess litter, invasive plants, and downed trees.
  • Ensure firefighters have access to the fuel break for greatest success3.

Benefits and Limitations

ACRE CategoryBenefitsLimitations
Soil Health
  • Prevents high soil temperatures and erosion associated with severe wildfires by minimizing spread and reducing fire intensity.
  • Increases bare soil4.

  • Removing vegetation increases erosion.

  • Heavy equipment used during establishment may increase soil compaction.

Water Management
  • N/A
  • Increased vulnerability to erosion may increase sediment loss.

  • Decreased vegetation may also decrease water uptake and reduce infiltration.

Nutrient Management
  • Avoids nutrient losses from volatilization due to avoided wildfires.
  • Reduced vegetation may reduce nutrient cycling.
Agricultural Production
  • Protects land and agricultural infrastructure from wildfire damage.
  • Removes land from production.
Biodiversity and Wildlife
  • By reducing the risk of wildfire, fuel breaks protect fish and wildlife habitat.

  • Removal of invasive plants enhances species composition.

GHG Emission
  • Vegetation removal may reduce short-term carbon sequestration.
Economics
  • State or federal programs provide cost assistance.

  • Fuel breaks limit economic loss from wildfire destruction.

  • May provide economic development when designed with co-benefits7.

  • Costs include hand tools for modifying and removing vegetation, herbicides, mowing, and controlled burns.

  • Installation requires the availability of qualified crew members, time, and often machinery.

Impact on Agricultural Resilience

Regional Applicability

  • Fuel breaks are applicable across any landscape or region with a goal of stopping or slowing wildfire spread. Fuel breaks are more prevalent in the western U.S., where wildfires are more common and severe. However, over the past few decades, fuel break adoption has become more widespread in northern boreal forests7.

Resources

References

  1. USDA-NRCS (2022). Conservation Practice Standard Document, Fuel Break, Code 383. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/383-NHCP-CPS-Fuel-Break-2021.pdf
  2. USDA-NRCS (2022). Conservation Practice Overview, Fuel Break, Code 383. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/383-NHCP-PO-Fuel-Break-2022.pdf
  3. Syphard, A. D., Keeley, J. E., & Brennan, T. J. (2011). Factors affecting fuel break effectiveness in the control of large fires on the Los Padres National Forest, California. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 20(6), 764-775.
  4. Shinneman, D. J., Germino, M. J., Pilliod, D. S., Aldridge, C. L., Vaillant, N. M., & Coates, P. S. (2019). The ecological uncertainty of wildfire fuel breaks: examples from the sagebrush steppe. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(5), 279-288.
  5. Keeley, J. E. (2006). Fire management impacts on invasive plants in the western United States. Conservation Biology, 20(2), 375-384.
  6. Ontl, T. A., Janowiak, M. K., Swanston, C. W., Daley, J., Handler, S., Cornett, M., et al. (2020). Forest management for carbon sequestration and climate adaptation. Journal of Forestry, 118(1), 86-101.
  7. Link, N. T., Johnstone, J. F., Walker, X. J., Amundsen, F., Berrios, H. K., Bibeau, L., et al. (2026). Mitigating increasing wildfire risk through fuel break innovations. iScience, 29(1).
Fuel Breaks photo 1

Photo 1: In Talkeetna, Alaska, a fuel break helps to reduce the spread of wildfires.

Photo courtesy of Alaska NRCS.

Fuel Breaks photo 2

Photo 2: In Sonoma, California, USDA Forest Service employees establish a shade fuel break to reduce wildfire spread and create a cooler understory.

Photo courtesy of USDA Forest Service.


  • Purdue University
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Iowa State University
  • Midwest Regional Climate Center
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture

This research is supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2023-67023-39246 from the USDA National Institute of Food & Agriculture.

Interested in participating in the project, or have questions?    Contact us!