ACRE - Agricultural Conservation for Resilient Environments

Prescribed Burning  (NRCS #338)

Applicable Systems

About

Prescribed burning, or prescribed fire, is a planned, controlled fire in a predetermined area1 2. Prescribed burns can be used to manage pests and weeds, improve wildlife habitat, increase plant and seed production, enhance soil health, improve forage quality, provide site restoration, and reduce fire risk. Prescribed burns should have a clear intended purpose or goal to inform effective management and preparation. Additionally, burn frequency may vary depending on goals and vegetation.

Key aspects and considerations:

  • Consider and monitor fuel type, topography of the site (slope), wind speed and direction, soil moisture, air temperature, and relative humidity to determine if environmental conditions are met to ensure a safe, effective burn. Check local conditions with NOAA Fire Weather and the National Interagency Fire Center, and test a small area at the site beforehand for insight into fire behavior.
  • Notify local fire departments, neighbors, and public health and safety officials.
  • Complete pre-burn preparation.
  • Ensure safety requirements, equipment needs, and the needed number of trained personnel are met.
  • Implement smoke management practices to reduce smoke impact.
  • After burning, complete a postburn evaluation.

Benefits and Limitations

ACRE CategoryBenefitsLimitations
Soil Health
  • May reduce runoff and erosion by enhancing vegetation in cropland, prairies, and forests.

  • Improves soil fertility by enhancing nutrient cycling.

  • Increases soil organic matter following burn3.

  • May improve habitat for soil organisms, which can in turn improve soil health.

  • Burns may initially deplete soil organisms and reduce microbial diversity3.
Water Management
  • Low intensity prescribed burns may indirectly support water quality improvements by reducing the risk of large-scale uncontrolled fires.
  • Fire chemically alters the soil, which can reduce infiltration and increase runoff and erosion4.
Nutrient Management
  • May increase volatilization, but loss is often limited with cooler, even burns5.

  • Frequent burns may reduce soil nutrients by slowing decomposition and reducing organic inputs.

  • In forested systems, prescribed fire reduces soil C and N storage6.

  • The impact of fire on nutrient availability varies by nutrient.

Agricultural Production
  • Improves forage quality and productivity5.

  • Improves interseeding preparation.

  • Reduces weed and pest pressure.

  • Limits the spread of invasive or unwanted species.

  • Boosts pasture productivity and promotes tree growth.

  • Reduces fuel loads and the risk of extreme wildfires5.

  • Decreases ecosystem productivity initially, but many upper Midwest ecosystems recover quickly from fire disturbance7.

  • Suitable burn days may be limited by weather conditions.

  • Continued research investigating interactions is needed to determine if prescribed burning addresses identified NRCS resource concerns5.

Biodiversity and Wildlife
  • Effective prescribed burns enhance biodiversity.

  • Encourages seed dispersal.

  • Reduces invasive species.

  • Enhances pollinator abundance.

  • In forested areas, prescribed burns increase regeneration rates of oak species and promote greater species diversity.

  • Inconsistently impacts habitat, as some species benefit while others face habitat degradation5.

  • Biodiversity response to prescribed burns is often inconsistent, and can vary by fire severity, taxa, and rainfall5 8.

GHG Emission
Economics
  • Training and certification can be time intensive, which brings associated costs.

  • Requires a burn plan, risk assessment, and permit fees, as well as personnel, fuel, burn control devices, and safety gear.

  • Costs vary based on size, complexity, and landscape features.

  • In the southern Great Plains, a 2024 report estimates that prescribed burns cost $11.32 per acre.

  • Requires extensive planning and permits.

Impact on Agricultural Resilience

Regional Applicability

Case Studies

  • A recent project supported by the Wisconsin Sea Grant brought together 30 stakeholders and Tribal partners to illustrate the reciprocal relationship between forests and fire. Evan Larson, a Professor of Geography at University of Wisconsin-Platteville and co-lead of the project, describes the work: "Together, the memories of people and trees will help us understand the deep connections that weave the community of life found on the points now and in the past. They'll help guide us moving forward."

Resources

References

  1. USDA-NRCS (2020). Conservation Practice Standard Document, Prescribed Burning, Code 338. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Prescribed_Burning_338_CPS_10_2020.pdf
  2. USDA-NRCS (2020). Conservation Practice Overview, Prescribed Burning, Code 338. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Prescribed_Burning_338_Overview_10_2020.pdf
  3. Alcañiz, M., Outeiro, L., Francos, M., & Úbeda, X. (2018). Effects of prescribed fires on soil properties: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 944-957.
  4. Agbeshie, A. A., Abugre, S., Atta-Darkwa, T., & Awuah, R. (2022). A review of the effects of forest fire on soil properties. Journal of Forestry Research, 33(5), 1419-1441.
  5. Fuhlendorf, S. D., Limb, R. F., Engle, D. M., & Miller, R. F. (2011). Assessment of prescribed fire as a conservation practice. Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps, 75-104.
  6. Nave, L. E., Vance, E. D., Swanston, C. W., & Curtis, P. S. (2011). Fire effects on temperate forest soil C and N storage. Ecological Applications, 21(4), 1189-1201.
  7. Meunier, J., & Sutheimer, C. M. (2022). Carbon Dynamics In Relation To Prescribed Fire In The Lake States.
  8. Pastro, L. A., Dickman, C. R., & Letnic, M. (2011). Burning for biodiversity or burning biodiversity? Prescribed burn vs. wildfire impacts on plants, lizards, and mammals. Ecological Applications, 21(8), 3238-3253.
  9. Wiedinmyer, C., & Hurteau, M. D. (2010). Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(6), 1926-1932.
  10. Hurteau, M., & North, M. (2009). Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(8), 409-414.
  11. Janowiak, M., Connelly, W. J., Dante-Wood, K., Giardina, C. P., Kayler, Z., Marcinkowski, K., et al., & Buford, M. (2017). Considering forest and grassland carbon in land management. General Technical Report, Washington Office, 95.
  12. Keller, A. B., & Handler, S. (2024). Effects of Fire on Ecosystem Carbon in the Midwest and Eastern United States. Technology Transfer. Houghton, MI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northern Forests Climate Hub. 8p. https://doi.org/10.32747/2024.8633530.ch
Prescribed Burning photo 1

Photo 1: A properly managed prescribed burn is a tool to manage vegetation.

Photo by Brooke DeCubellis, NRCS.

Prescribed Burning photo 2

Photo 2: Prescribed burns reduce eastern red cedar encroachment in South Dakota.

Photo courtesy of South Dakota NRCS. Attribution: "2017 GrimBurn4" by USDA NRCS South Dakota, CC BY-SA 2.0.


  • Purdue University
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Iowa State University
  • Midwest Regional Climate Center
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture

This research is supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2023-67023-39246 from the USDA National Institute of Food & Agriculture.

Interested in participating in the project, or have questions?    Contact us!